Cellphone Searches
The Ohio Supreme Court has struck an important blow for privacy rights, ruling that the police need a warrant to search a cellphone. The court rightly recognized that cellphones today are a lot more than just telephones, that they hold a wealth of personal information and that the privacy interest in them is considerable. This was the first such ruling from a state supreme court. It is a model for other courts to follow.
Searches generally require warrants, but courts have carved out limited categories in which they are not needed. One of these is that police officers are allowed, when they arrest people, to search them and the area immediately surrounding them, as well as some kinds of containers in their possession.
When the police arrested Antwaun Smith on drug charges they seized his cellphone and searched it, examining his call records. The police did not have a warrant or the consent of Mr. Smith.
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled this month, by a 4-to-3 vote, that the search violated the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure. Rather than seeing a cellphone as a simple closed container, the majority noted that modern cellphones — especially ones that permit Internet access — are “capable of storing a wealth of digitized information.”
This is information, the court said, for which people reasonably have a high expectation of privacy, and under established Fourth Amendment principles, police officers must get a search warrant before they can look through call logs or examine other data. The court wisely decided that it made no sense to try to distinguish among various kinds of cellphones based on what specific functions they have. All cellphones, the court said, fall under the search warrant requirement.
Few federal courts have considered the issue of cellphone searches, and they have disagreed about whether a warrant should be required. The Ohio ruling eloquently makes the case for why the very personal information that new forms of technology aggregate must be accorded a significant degree of privacy.
api Related Posts-
Facebook Privacy Policies Draw Criticism [/caption] By Douglas MacMillan May 6 (Bloomberg) -- Facebook Inc., the largest social networking site, is facing renewed criticism from... -
Finnish mall gunman kills five, then found dead [/caption] ESPOO, Finland — A lone gunman killed four people in a rampage in a Finnish shopping mall Thursday and... -
NYC car bomb suspect pleads guilty [/caption] NEW YORK – Calling himself a Muslim soldier, a defiant Pakistan-born U.S. citizen pleaded guilty Monday to carrying out... -
A Second Incident Aboard a Flight to Detroit [/caption] By MICHELINE MAYNARD and ELISABETH BUMILLER Published: December 27, 2009 DETROIT — The pilots of Northwest Airlines Flight 253... -
The REAL Facts behind the Census 2010 [/caption] By Mark Lasswell From Reader's Digest Every ten years, the U.S. government essentially takes attendance, using results to distribute...
-
MonaVie Sends a Second Cease & Desist On Friday afternoon, MonaVie sent Corey Whitlaw an "official-ish" Cease and Desist Order (CDO) to my Lazy Man and Money... -
Top Blogging Strategies Whether your blog is about general interest topics like how you washed a crayon in your son's pocket and there's... -
SEO: Success On The World Wide Web When all is said and done, the only way that an Internet based business is going to thrive (even survive,... -
Shopping Professionally pt 2 One of the best ways that you can save money is to shop professionally, which is learning how to develop... -
Basic Information About Search Engine Optimization Fifteen years ago if we need information we had to go to library. Writing reports, and preparing for test required...
